[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Net Neutrality...
- Subject: Net Neutrality...
- From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brett Glass" <nanog at brettglass.com>
> Estimates of the maximum bandwidths of all the human senses, combined,
> range between the capacity of a T1 line (at the low end) and
> about 4 Mbps (at the high end). A human being simply is not wired to
> accept more input. (Yes, machines could digest more... which means that
> additional bandwidth to and from the home might be useful for the purpose
> of spying on us.) What does this imply about the FCC's proposal to
> redefine "broadband" as a symmetrical 10 Mbps?
That they understand that more than one person lives in a house.
"Spying on us"?
<plonk>
Cheers,
-- jr 'I retract the apology' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274