[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Filter on IXP
- Subject: Filter on IXP
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:15:41 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAPpGzHFQoqqB6SKP1c1nX=LX9=C7djhi5szwN1trxE8bVMNJDg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CABSP1OfetOSRO0wrOdCWtAkOhnk0DJ00F=rDYn9bw+kDNrh8sg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTfkjPJWQQpqvaUbiuOikWG=LEnw1o0=gaOm4_eUBGwNA@mail.gmail.com> <CABSP1Of35gXMLN4qJ0KuhHL9=8QuLMCBoZvFTpfM3aGs2BkHEg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGS_-uKWeesQKHt=PE=ynvHvyCVsODxatu4haVcHYkBd+g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGTvnOzp0c171UdFStF6HQaeogGCu=-ReGWNLOo7vSpx8g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
>> It would be really cool if peering exchanges could police ntp on
>> their connected members.
> Well, THIS looks like the worst idea ever.
while i agree that this is an extremely stupid idea, clearly you have
not been reading this list for very long
randy