[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SIP on FTTH systems
- Subject: SIP on FTTH systems
- From: mansaxel at besserwisser.org (Måns Nilsson)
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:19:59 +0100
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Subject: SIP on FTTH systems Date: Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:52:51PM -0500 Quoting Jean-Francois Mezei (jfmezei_nanog at vaxination.ca):
> Quick question:
>
> I am thinking in a possible wholesale FTTH environment operated by a
> telco where the end user is connected to ISP-X via PPPoE.
>
> ONTs have built-in ATAs that can provide POTS service to a house and do
> SIP/VoIP over the fibre with QoS system to ensure VoIP traffic gets through.
>
> In a scenario where the data PPPoE connection is done by an external
> router, what are the options to operate the VoIP service so that
>
> - VoIP still uses the special lane on the GPON with QoS
>
> - VoIP gets IP from ISP-X and traffic flow via ISP-X so that telco is
> not involved in routing such traffic or allocating an IP address ?
Or, one could make sure everything has a globally unique IP address and is
using reasonably secured communications. The downside is that one
then can't defend the existence of those empire-building middleboxes. It
is not the telco way, so is of course unthinkable. Like anything beyond
WAP was on cell phones a decade ago.
Warum soll man es einfach machen,
wenn man es so sch?n komplizieren kann?
(Why make things simple when you can
build them so beautifully complicated?)
--
M?ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
We are now enjoying total mutual interaction in an imaginary hot tub ...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140206/4fff7827/attachment.bin>