[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

10Gb iPerf kit?

Subject: 10Gb iPerf kit?
From: pete at fiberphone.co.nz (Pete Mundy)
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:01:08 +1300
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAJXc8RLdBJKyjy9e-Cpb7f+uwo5FTWO7zWrzrDXiHBT-YPXEFw@mail.gmail.com>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 8/12/2014, at 5:48 AM, Teleric Team <teleric-lists at outlook.com> wrote:

> Again, with 64byte packet size? Or are you talking MTU?

You have a very good point. My 1gig tests have always been for throughput rather than pps, and therefore was using MTU sized packets and though would be much less load on the CPU.

Pete

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4145 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20141209/688f483e/attachment.bin>

References:
- 10Gb iPerf kit?
  - From: pete at fiberphone.co.nz (Pete Mundy)
- 10Gb iPerf kit?
  - From: teleric-lists at outlook.com (Teleric Team)

Prev by Date: What can I infer from "show ip route" and similar BGP commands?
Next by Date: Followup: Survey results for the ARIN RPA
Previous by thread: 10Gb iPerf kit?
Next by thread: Chicago Amazon
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread