[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
- Subject: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
- From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:23:35 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAL9jLaZ6HC-rOceXwP9HC6ppMqkUw9V8JujyKBmkWG-f=tmjBw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaZ6HC-rOceXwP9HC6ppMqkUw9V8JujyKBmkWG-f=tmjBw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:04 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:57:05 -0500, Andrew Gallo said:
>>
>>> In the past few months, I've spoken with, or heard second hand, from a
>>> number of organizations that will not or cannot sign ARIN's RPKI Relying
>>> Agreement.
>>
>> Do we have a handle on *why* organizations are having issues with the
>> agreement?
>
> wes outlined some of his reasons here:
> https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/wednesday_george_adventuresinrpki_62.9.pdf
>
> michael sinatra did a reasonable coverage as well in a previous nanog
> meeting (I think?)
also, john curran covers some of the legal indemnification stuff about here:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGSo4uiYyAc#t=1868>
in the video of the slide presentation above.