[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
A case against vendor-locking optical modules
- Subject: A case against vendor-locking optical modules
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:43:17 -0800
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <9578293AE169674F9A048B2BC9A081B401572054A0@MUNPRDMBXA1.medline.com> <1545079773.489926.1416248928171.JavaMail.zimbra@snappytelecom.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Justin M. Streiner <streiner at cluebyfour.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
>
>> Is it unrealistic to hope for enough salesmen pressure on the corporate
>> ladder to make such moronic attitude be reversed in the short term ?
>
> No salesperson is likely to do that for you. They know only to well that eliminating vendor lock-in means they will lose sales on artificially costly optics from $vendor to a lower-cost rival. Less sales = less commission for the affected sales person.
>
> jms
Which is why there is NO Arista gear in my networkâ?¦ They lose sales of costly routers as well as optics to any customer who doesnâ??t want to promote this behavior.
It boils down to how much you want to tolerate/support/encourage this behavior.
If you feel strongly like I do that such behavior is aberrant and should be strongly discouraged, then vote with your $$$ and donâ??t buy from vendors that do that. Let your vendors that you donâ??t buy from know why they lost the sale.
Iâ??ve found that showing a vendor a price-redacted copy of the PO to the other vendor can often lead to changes in the way they approach the next sales cycle.
Owen