[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?

Subject: [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?
From: bernat at luffy.cx (Vincent Bernat)
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:13:45 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (Paul S.'s message of "Wed, 06 Aug 2014 20:54:24 +0900")
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAJygYd2ZJKJ4kabN3sLLFuVnDaop12ojYwpKFZ=39KKA-Mrb-A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

 â?¦  6 aoÃ»t 2014 20:54 +0900, "Paul S." <contact at winterei.se>Â :

> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't OSPF require the AFL license
> anyway to be 'legitly' ran?

OSPF does not need a feature license on those models (it is needed on
EX2200). AFL is needed for BGP, IS-IS and MPLS.
-- 
Use statement labels that mean something.
            - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)

Follow-Ups:
- [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?
  - From: contact at winterei.se (Paul S.)

References:
- [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?
  - From: contact at winterei.se (Paul S.)

Prev by Date: [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?
Next by Date: [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?
Previous by thread: [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?
Next by thread: [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread