[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter.
- Subject: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter.
- From: tkaufman at corp.nac.net (Timothy Kaufman)
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 17:53:48 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CAAGWaEeF3LawyK5n5U6FAQdeUvXNcfBG6-skayic_m_yz2ojeg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAJcK4gputiCQaKfKj2P890+9XM_hpx7SYfVtx=3n2UMiSZF4SA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAGWaEeF3LawyK5n5U6FAQdeUvXNcfBG6-skayic_m_yz2ojeg@mail.gmail.com>
Correct me if I'm wrong but the solid optics power meter is just rebranded PPI?
Also what about a decent but reasonably priced OSA?
Suggestions?
Tim Kaufman
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Walter
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 8:02 PM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter.
We also have a Solid Optics CWDM meter and it does the job quite nicely. It feels solid (haha...) and is relatively cheap.
--
Jeff Walter
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Neil Davidson <neil at knd.org> wrote:
> We have the Solid Optics DWDM and CWDM power meters. Simple,
> inexpensive and works well ...
> http://www.solid-optics.com/category/cwdm-dwdm/power-meter ... n
>
>
>
> --
>
> K. Neil Davidson
> +1-720-258-6345
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Tom Hill <tom at ninjabadger.net> wrote:
>
> > On 28/07/14 19:33, Timothy Kaufman wrote:
> >
> >> Also maybe the ODPM-48.
> >>
> >
> > I've got the CWDM version of this, and it does the job. Haven't
> > explored the test result downloading/archiving features (didn't
> > expect them to
> work
> > with Linux anyway) but overall it was very helpful for measuring
> > loss across various passive muxes (where DDM wasn't available).
> >
> > Tom
> >
>