[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

DNSSEC?

On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Barry Shein <bzs at world.std.com> wrote:

> 
> So, DNSSEC is also compromised by this heartbleed bug, right?

Nope, apples and oranges.

http://www.afilias.info/webfm_send/32

The only point of intersection I can think of is an indirect one, and unfortunately not much used yet: DANE certificates for TLS/SSL connections.

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140411/046cdea5/attachment.bin>