[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fundamental questions of backbone design
- Subject: Fundamental questions of backbone design
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:46:48 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:33:16 +0530." <CAJ0+aXbB3b-hBKA0oUyRedTAbcO8MWPtn+=kk8GEsZFO544HKg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJ0+aXbB3b-hBKA0oUyRedTAbcO8MWPtn+=kk8GEsZFO544HKg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:33:16 +0530, Anurag Bhatia said:
> localpref to customer routes then peering and finally transit. Does this
> works well or you see issues with people who have 10+ prepends on some
> peering routes calling you to not send traffic via those circuits?
OK. I admit being perplexed. Under what conditions will somebody have that
many prepends and you *still* end up routing via that path if you have
another path available?
I guess if they were silly and prepended themselves 10 times and then
announced the result to the upstreams of *both* paths you have available...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20131018/2d30bfd8/attachment-0001.bin>