comcast ipv6 PTR

[Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)]

On 10/9/13 12:52 PM, "Blair Trosper" <blair.trosper at gmail.com> wrote:


>That's essentially what I'm getting at.  If the v6 addresses/blocks are
>allocated in a similar fashion to IPv4, where the octets are clearly named
>by state and "hsd1", then I don't see why they should lack PTR.

With the small # of IPv4 addresses, generating PTRs was not a big deal.
That is not the case for IPv6 and I believe most large scale network
operators would agree with that.

>However, even if they're not assigned or delegated in that way, it'd be
>helpful to have SOME form of PTR on there.

Helpful for what, precisely?

Jason