[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Meraki
- Subject: Meraki
- From: silvertip257 at gmail.com (SilverTip257)
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:13:03 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CALFTrnOa3N3pkVFoo4M+3ihzGQV=-BFqkGaTG_hKn9KjT583Hg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CA+W-zopQpRzpOCXfBjyC1o9i0r_mEHujah94Q4LQenoBv9YWew@mail.gmail.com> <CALFTrnOa3N3pkVFoo4M+3ihzGQV=-BFqkGaTG_hKn9KjT583Hg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Ray Soucy <rps at maine.edu> wrote:
> Can confirm the current ER Lite is a plastic enclosure.
> But for $ 100 I can definitely look past that.
>
At that price point I'm not complaining.
However I do have a preference. ;)
And I do think that the metal cases are a better design - sturdier and
likely better heat dissipation.
>
> Also, most of the UBNT distributers seem to be very knowledgeable about
> the product line, so I'm sure they would know if you asked them :-)
>
Our rep had to do some digging...
He managed to tell me that the ERLite now has a metal case. He did not
tell me whether they have any with metal enclosures. But that's probably
hard for them to say though.
>
> We've been running XORP internally for about 100+ CPE devices (actually
> the ones we were looking at Vyatta as a replacement for). In the end I
> think that moving to Quagga was a good thing for Vyatta as XORP doesn't
> have a very active developer community. XORP releases since 1.6 have been a
> forked code base that eventually became XORP 1.8. It's very touchy, and
> requires quite a bit of operational experience to know what will cause it
> to crash and what won't. The big thing you get with XORP that you don't
> with Quagga is multicast routing, and a more active community. I've been
> really interested in BIRD [0] as well, but haven't had a chance to try it
> out.
>
>
BIRD is on my list too.
> Back to UBNT, though. The ER makes use of a lot of non-free code (not so
> great), but it's to facilitate hardware acceleration (very nice). A lot of
> functionality for IPv4 and IPv6 are both implemented in hardware, including
> not just forwarding and NAT, but also regex matching for DPI. It's how
> they can get so much PPS for such a modest piece of hardware. I believe
> the chips they use are from Cavium [1], but I could be mistaken.
>
> [0]. http://bird.network.cz/
> [1]. http://www.cavium.com/
>
>
Thanks for the informative discussion, Ray! And others :)
--
---~~.~~---
Mike
// SilverTip257 //
- References:
- Meraki
- From: silvertip257 at gmail.com (SilverTip257)
- Meraki
- From: rps at maine.edu (Ray Soucy)