Automatic abuse reports

[sam at circlenet.us (Sam Moats)]

Don't have access to a normal PC right now but I agreed with this 
approach so much that I'm typing a response on a 10 button pad.
Sam

On 2013-11-13 21:33, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Sam Moats <sam at circlenet.us [1]>
> wrote:
>
>  ?
>
>> about its long term benefit to the entire network. I cant think of a
>> way to remove the incentive for this
>> short term thinking.
>
> The end users can, ?by inquiring ?about the abuse desk, before
> agreeing to sign up for service.
>
> In this manner ?"Not having a good abuse" ?desk becomes a cost
> center, in the form of suppressed opportunities for future revenue.
>
> Federal entities, etc, ?when soliciting for proposals from ISPs and
> service providers.... ? ?in addition to the ?"Must have IPv6
> support",
>
> could add a line ?"Must have a highly-responsive abuse desk/abuse
> contact; ?with 4 ?professional references from email or network
> operators in the industry who have worked with the abuse desk";
>
> must ?aggregate and report ?matters of potential abuse or complaints
> ?regarding subscribers ?outgoing mail or IP traffic within ?3 hours
> on average, during business hours.... and within ?5 hours ?24x7 ...
> etc...
>
> --
> -JH?
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] mailto:sam at circlenet.us