[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ISIS and OSPF together

Subject: ISIS and OSPF together
From: jaydesh9 at gmail.com (Jayram Deshpande)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 16:06:54 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAPLq3UN6KcDLxA9uq+XW9PLt04YGwaHHe3N-6i136upbCEc5eQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPLq3UN6KcDLxA9uq+XW9PLt04YGwaHHe3N-6i136upbCEc5eQ@mail.gmail.com>

Sent from my iPhone

On May 12, 2013, at 1:41 AM, Glen Kent <glen.kent at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> The other instance would be when say OSPF is used to manage the OOB network
> and the ISIS is used for network reachability.
> 
> Is there any other scenario?

Yes,  in virtualization world , where people no more want to waste their links that form loops, there are scenarios where you may have a TRILL deployment that runs over IS-IS while you have OSPF running side by side. 

-Jay

References:
- ISIS and OSPF together
  - From: glen.kent at gmail.com (Glen Kent)

Prev by Date: Spamcop Blacklist
Next by Date: "Network Engineering" Stack Exchange site in Area51 (fwd)
Previous by thread: ISIS and OSPF together
Next by thread: ISIS and OSPF together
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread