[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

.nyc - here we go...

Subject: .nyc - here we go...
From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 21:29:02 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAGFn2k32xi6xqdt2Ld2ivQ4vjm5m6mOkz3Soo_pXVQ+yzR24OA@mail.gmail.com> <CANQy6FbRwBn8U=4z__LCrsWrqbmepAY3Vy+NOdch_J3xufhFpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGFn2k3ozDrDR-0VmYWMgnbxF8YC1RsXTFJ6khv46rb6sRVgQA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

Now you are thinking. :-)

- ferg


On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon at cox.net> wrote:

> Makes me wonder if concern for routing table size is worrying about the
> right thing.
>


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com

References:
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: surfer at mauigateway.com (Scott Weeks)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: rubensk at gmail.com (Rubens Kuhl)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: rubensk at gmail.com (Rubens Kuhl)
- .nyc - here we go...
  - From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)

Prev by Date: .nyc - here we go...
Next by Date: .nyc - here we go...
Previous by thread: .nyc - here we go...
Next by thread: .nyc - here we go...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread