[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs

Subject: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:08:05 -0500
In-reply-to: <1361513943.28479.437.camel@karl>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1361513943.28479.437.camel@karl>

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:19:03PM +1100, Karl Auer wrote:
> It's a convention common enough and useful enough that I can see why
> people would want a handy term for it.

How about "stopdot"?  Seems to cover the function and the form.

---rsk

Follow-Ups:
- looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)

References:
- looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
  - From: reichert at numachi.com (Brian Reichert)
- looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
  - From: kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer)

Prev by Date: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
Next by Date: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
Previous by thread: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
Next by thread: looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread