[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
/. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now
- Subject: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now
- From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:04:03 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAFANWtX+svDY=cVZPieV3fbBiY6Qwu_H5AOd+STUUEMEKyY3AQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAFANWtX+svDY=cVZPieV3fbBiY6Qwu_H5AOd+STUUEMEKyY3AQ@mail.gmail.com>
In a message written on Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:58:09AM -0400, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
> I recall 40Gbit/s Ethernet being promoted heavily for similar reasons
> as the ones in this article, but then 100Gbit/s being the technology
> that actually ended up in most places. Could this be the same thing
> happening?
Everything I've read sounds like a repeat of the same broken decision
making that happened last time.
That is unsurprising though, the same people are involved.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120927/ab06728a/attachment.bin>