[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)

Subject: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
From: tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com (Tore Anderson)
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:07:18 +0200
In-reply-to: <m28vc2fglk.wl%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m28vc2fglk.wl%[email protected]>

* Randy Bush

>> Both DS-Lite and NAT64 contain some form of a ?giant NAT box? as part
>> of the solution, I'm afraid. Same shit, different wrapping.
> 
> ds-lite is in the provider core.  talk to the telco's lawyers when you
> want to use a new protocol.
> 
> nat64 is at my cpe border.

Mark was asking about how to run IPv6-only to his subscribers. I don't
see how doing NAT64 in the CPE could possibly help him with that, as the
NAT64 function would require an IPv4 address for its outside interface.

-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

References:
- Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
  - From: mark at amplex.net (Mark Radabaugh)
- Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
  - From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar)
- Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
  - From: mark at amplex.net (Mark Radabaugh)
- Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
  - From: tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com (Tore Anderson)
- Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
Next by Date: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
Previous by thread: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
Next by thread: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread