[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Real world sflow vs netflow?

Subject: Real world sflow vs netflow?
From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:10:39 +0100
In-reply-to: <CAB8g2zw9BD5U8TmGSy9GJjRJW59xd38wNVcChKtWc_xjwGS8Qg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CAB8g2zzmCH8MMAMVum6i5WZFRxmXXApUvd5KD0-WZH1fXfdKbA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAB8g2zw9BD5U8TmGSy9GJjRJW59xd38wNVcChKtWc_xjwGS8Qg@mail.gmail.com>

On 20/09/2012 17:59, Peter Phaal wrote:
> What do people think?

Flows are good for measuring some things; raw packet sampling is good for
measuring others.

Decide on what you're trying to measure, then pick the best tool for the job.

Nick

References:
- Real world sflow vs netflow?
  - From: peter.phaal at gmail.com (Peter Phaal)

Prev by Date: Apologies to the Verilan guy
Next by Date: Real world sflow vs netflow?
Previous by thread: Real world sflow vs netflow?
Next by thread: Real world sflow vs netflow?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread