[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 Ignorance

Subject: IPv6 Ignorance
From: aid at logic.org.uk (Adrian Bool)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:23:18 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m2zk4p2uys.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Hi Mike,

On 17 Sep 2012, at 16:04, Mike Simkins <mike.simkins at sungard.com> wrote:
> RIPE 552 (I think), allows you to request up to a /29 without additional
> justification if needed.

Sure, but you're just tinkering at the edges here.

32-bits would be a more sensible allocation size to LIRs, allowing them construct their addressing plan in a logical, hierarchal manner whilst allowing for growth - and most importantly ensuring they only advertise a single route into the global routing table.

Kind regards,

Adrian

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 Ignorance
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (joel jaeggli)

References:
- IPv6 Ignorance
  - From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)
- IPv6 Ignorance
  - From: mitch at illuminati.org (John Mitchell)
- IPv6 Ignorance
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- IPv6 Ignorance
  - From: mitch at illuminati.org (John Mitchell)
- IPv6 Ignorance
  - From: aid at logic.org.uk (Adrian Bool)
- IPv6 Ignorance
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- IPv6 Ignorance
  - From: aid at logic.org.uk (Adrian Bool)
- IPv6 Ignorance
  - From: mike.simkins at sungard.com (Mike Simkins)

Prev by Date: IPv6 Ignorance
Next by Date: IPv6 Ignorance
Previous by thread: IPv6 Ignorance
Next by thread: IPv6 Ignorance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread