RPKI Pilot Participant Notice

[randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)]

> If a relying party's use of PKI infrastructure legally equated to 
> acceptance of the relying party agreement (RPA), then having an 
> explicit record of acceptance of the RPA would not be necessary.  
> 
> Alas, it does not appear possible to equate use of PKI certificates 
> with agreement to the associated RPA (and some might argue that this 
> is a feature, as some folks would not want to be legally bound to an 
> agreement which they did not explicitly review and accept.)

do you have a r&d group devoted to how much you can delay, damage, warp,
half-assed implement, ... rpki?  look around you at the real world, the
other rirs (especiall ripe/ncc), etc.  the only part of it where arin
seems to be doing a serious job is bs generation.  thanks.

randy