[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bird vs Quagga revisited
- Subject: Bird vs Quagga revisited
- From: edward.dore at freethought-internet.co.uk (Edward Dore)
- Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:44:24 +0100
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <4277105.1655.1346254798425.JavaMail.Administrator@TMA01> <1346413447.18274.422.camel@pc2> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
The Linux Kernel itself may be GPL (which I wasn't debating), however I see no reason why MikroTik's MPLS stack couldn't work in a similar way to the closed source NVidia driers where my understanding is that a GPL stub loads a binary blob.
Have you asked MikroTik for a copy of the source?
Edward Dore
Freethought Internet
On 1 Sep 2012, at 09:12, Bj?rn Mork wrote:
> Edward Dore <edward.dore at freethought-internet.co.uk> writes:
>
>> They used to publish the source for their 2.4 kernel on
>> routerboard.com (in fact, it's still available at
>> http://routerboard.com/files/linux-2.4.31.zip), but I've not seen
>> anything for the 2.6 kernel however and the routerboard.com site was
>> redesigned a little while ago, seemingly without the links as far as I
>> can tell.
>>
>> It might be a case of you need to ask them for it. Would be
>> interesting to see which bits are GPL.
>
> There is no doubt that *all* bits of the Linux kernel are GPL. Whether
> vendors respect this is another question. But Mikrotik most certainly
> cannot distribute the Linux kernel, modified or not, without also
> providing the full source code.
>
>
> Bj?rn