[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)

Subject: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
From: snoble at sonn.com (Steven Noble)
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:59:20 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAGqGmqbTsnO3WD6HR=4oVX_2=YsdWaii9b7+yApZMd1zBaaSPQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAGqGmqZEaFpSvFUHYW2qy1SDS7oFnGqnHQ8WtYeQrDgdxonLQA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Roland,

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 15, 2012, at 7:47 PM, "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:

> I know all about the forwarding capabilities of modern general-purpose CPUs, ring-buffers, et. al.  I know what is possible, and what isn't possible.  And please, no more from the Vyatta crowd, et. al. - they're like the s/Flow shouters, only more so.

What is possible these days with ivy bridge based CPUs and the DPDK?  How many pps can you do per core assuming you are using the highest performing CPU currently commercially available?

References:
- Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
  - From: sh.vahabzadeh at gmail.com (Shahab Vahabzadeh)
- Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
  - From: sh.vahabzadeh at gmail.com (Shahab Vahabzadeh)
- Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
  - From: malayter at gmail.com (Ryan Malayter)
- Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)

Prev by Date: If you are using APNIC as an RPKI trust anchor, please update your Trust Anchor Set.
Next by Date: Internet-wide port scans
Previous by thread: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
Next by thread: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread