[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?

Subject: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:01:51 -1000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>


Jo Rhett wrote:
> 
> I've finally convinced $DAYJOB to deploy IPv6.  Justification for the
> IP space is easy, however the truth is that a /64 is more than we need
> in all locations. However the last I heard was that you can't
> effectively announce anything smaller than a /48.  Is this still true?
> 
> Is this likely to change in the immediate future, or do I need to ask
> for a /44?

/48 is the new /24

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
  - From: mansaxel at besserwisser.org (Måns Nilsson)

References:
- Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
  - From: jrhett at netconsonance.com (Jo Rhett)

Prev by Date: [NANOG-announce] NANOG 56 Reminders
Next by Date: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Previous by thread: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Next by thread: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread