[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
- Subject: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
- From: rcarpen at network1.net (Randy Carpenter)
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:08:06 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
> > ----------------------------------------------------
>
> > A /48 is 65536 /64s and a /44 is 16x65536 /64s. If you
> > only need one subnet (1 subnet = 1 /64), why would you
> > try to get 16x65536 subnets, rather than the 65536 you
> > have in the /48?
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> He said it was for multiple sites.
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> DOH!
> Note to self: focus on the outage and don't respond to NANOG
> while troubleshooting. ;-)
>
>
> scott
Sometimes a brief distraction can be therapeutic when under pressure ;-)
-Randy