[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

names are not numbers, was IPv4 address length technical design

Subject: names are not numbers, was IPv4 address length technical design
From: joe at nethead.com (Joe Hamelin)
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 19:43:27 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 6:14 PM, John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hey, I've got a great idea.  Let's lose this silly phone number
> portability nonsense and use phone numbers as routes.
>

You do not want to go down the hell hole that is SS7.

--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474

References:
- IPv4 address length technical design
  - From: bzs at world.std.com (Barry Shein)
- names are not numbers, was IPv4 address length technical design
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)

Prev by Date: ESR muses on, among other things, the early IETF
Next by Date: IPv4 address length technical design
Previous by thread: names are not numbers, was IPv4 address length technical design
Next by thread: names are not numbers, was IPv4 address length technical design
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread