[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things
- Subject: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things
- From: lane.powers at swat.coop (Lane Powers)
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 20:08:52 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAJL_ZMM1FYske=QoHf7KzxZMZmc5YMaSDnk8Lo1fSxxds18fTw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJWBqEs1C3_XwKt2m+RqONwStPt4zCGXEk+Li7wt+N6YbFydzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJL_ZMM1FYske=QoHf7KzxZMZmc5YMaSDnk8Lo1fSxxds18fTw@mail.gmail.com>
In case you missed it
On Oct 5, 2012, at 7:05 PM, jim deleskie <deleskie at gmail.com> wrote:
> I know that I should know better then comment on networks others then
> my own, ( and I know to never comment on my own publicly :) )
>
>
> But here goes, 210x the size of normal really? 210% I'd have a hard
> time believing. Did anyone else anywhere see a route leak equal to
> larger then the entire Internet that day, anywhere else that could of
> caused this?
>
> I won't even get into max-prefix and how we've managed this long with
> someone people still not setting them.
>
>
> -jim
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Anton Kapela <tkapela at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Submitted without comment:
>> http://inside.godaddy.com/inside-story-happened-godaddy-com-sept-10-2012/
>>
>> -Tk
>
>