[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things
- Subject: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:17:44 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:05:07 -0300." <CAJL_ZMM1FYske=QoHf7KzxZMZmc5YMaSDnk8Lo1fSxxds18fTw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJWBqEs1C3_XwKt2m+RqONwStPt4zCGXEk+Li7wt+N6YbFydzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJL_ZMM1FYske=QoHf7KzxZMZmc5YMaSDnk8Lo1fSxxds18fTw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:05:07 -0300, jim deleskie said:
> But here goes, 210x the size of normal really? 210% I'd have a hard
> time believing. Did anyone else anywhere see a route leak equal to
> larger then the entire Internet that day, anywhere else that could of
> caused this?
If the device was only expecting 2K or so internal routes, getting hit with
the 440K routes in the DFZ would be 210x....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20121005/ed5beb5b/attachment.bin>