[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

Subject: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:24:30 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD_uLpN76w-26nssD0iietrKQ_V47JXDnXG9CA3ZAH=oLhE94Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the "native" percentage?
> 
> As the traffic is delivered as native traffic to Google I don't think Google can even see that there is a tunnel between them and the user. They might see a lower MTU, but to Google the traffic is native IPv6.
> 
> - Sander
> 

That's only really true of the 6in4 (tunnel broker) tunnels. The 6to4 traffic that comes through our 6to4 or any other 6to4 gateways, OTOH, will have 2002::/16 addresses which makes it just as obvious as Teredo.

Owen

References:
- Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
  - From: tpoder at cis.vutbr.cz (Tomas Podermanski)
- Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
  - From: aaron.toponce at gmail.com (Aaron Toponce)
- Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
  - From: wmaton at ottix.net (William F. Maton Sotomayor)
- Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
  - From: oliver at g.garraux.net (Oliver Garraux)
- Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
  - From: sander at steffann.nl (Sander Steffann)

Prev by Date: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
Next by Date: The Verge article about Verizon's Sandy Cleanup Efforts in Manhattan
Previous by thread: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
Next by thread: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread