[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD
- Subject: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD
- From: mike at mtcc.com (Michael Thomas)
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 17:57:11 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAPiURgUWZLJ8f7gS3HpR=0KE_TZ5OmmYBJ5VhPd729wvNpC_yQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAGFn2k3_7CkPtxgF_FqVZZ7Z-c_fRwtmmsPQKu9T=4qb6nUfGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPiURgUWZLJ8f7gS3HpR=0KE_TZ5OmmYBJ5VhPd729wvNpC_yQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/31/2012 05:43 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> I think this is an interesting concept, but i don't know how well it will
> hold up in the long run. All the initial verification and continuous
> scanning will no doubtingly give the .secure TLD a high cost relative to
> other TLD's.
>
Countries would never all agree on what the definition of "secure"
was, so clearly we'll have to have
secure.ly
secure.it
secure.us
secure.no
...
Mike