[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

Subject: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
From: ryanczak at gmail.com (Matt Ryanczak)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 07:33:15 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaY-8DuWruzgtroRi5YxgWVHeAuvGZV-k6ff6e_FkiUNgQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On 5/25/12 2:35 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> 
> 	I wouldn't be so picky to have an static IP address in my phone, bur for sure I want a global IPvx one.

but would you want that dynamic IP address behind layers of NAT, ALG,
etc. or open and accessible?

Follow-Ups:
- Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
  - From: aservin at lacnic.net (Arturo Servin)

References:
- Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
  - From: rcarpen at network1.net (Randy Carpenter)
- Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
  - From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
  - From: arturo.servin at gmail.com (Arturo Servin)

Prev by Date: Industry practice for BGP costs - one time or fixed/monthly?
Next by Date: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
Previous by thread: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
Next by thread: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread