[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
- Subject: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
- From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 18:16:09 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 26 May 2012 06:44:58 +0900." <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaaOzte1F+aOTu=qK1uLLnrf--Er90oz9ey6ys7+5eydHg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Sat, 26 May 2012 06:44:58 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
> An IPv4 home address may be shared by many mobile
> terminals distinguished by port numbers, which is
> why IPv6 is not necessary.
An IPv4 address can also be shared by many mobile terminals
distinguished by AOL userids. How did that work out?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120525/53f6a56a/attachment.bin>