[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ISPs and full packet inspection
- Subject: ISPs and full packet inspection
- From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:24:42 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 May 2012 09:13:16 -0400." <CAKF9zbBoWQ8sqBZNThXaW0Vw6YjjMO80eg3E5O5=vHq35yv3xw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAKF9zbBnvkw4bEq3f1YP0bXM9bS0in+Axj=0zrmnN3YZKcdKmA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAKF9zbBoWQ8sqBZNThXaW0Vw6YjjMO80eg3E5O5=vHq35yv3xw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:13:16 -0400, not common said:
> Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which is one
> guy, that can't spell IP) and VPs.
You probably want to fix that legal team. If you're an ISP and your legal eagle
doesn't understand networking, you're opening yourself up to a world of hurt.
> There has to be some thing out there or is this really a hands of topic?
There's a whole mess of applicable laws. Patrick Darden just posed a good
intro as I was writing this.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120524/7f5b48ac/attachment.bin>