[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

rpki vs. secure dns?

Subject: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 15:51:15 +0000
In-reply-to: <20120501103111.6a4b243c@localhost>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m27gwx5ikh.wl%[email protected]> <20120501103111.6a4b243c@localhost>

On May 1, 2012, at 10:31 PM, John Kristoff wrote:

> As Radia says in her book, we're probably stuck with BGP forever, but I frequently wonder if she is right in suggesting we could have done
> better by having a link state protocol instead.

At the time, link-state protocols weren't practical for the scale required - even today, it would be problematic.

Ideally, this would be very nice, but I just don't think it's practical, even today.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

	  Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.

		       -- John Milton

References:
- rpki vs. secure dns?
  - From: jtk at cymru.com (John Kristoff)

Prev by Date: rpki vs. secure dns?
Next by Date: Comcast DNS admin?
Previous by thread: rpki vs. secure dns?
Next by thread: rpki vs. secure dns?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread