[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

shared address space... a reality!

Subject: shared address space... a reality!
From: tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk (Tim Chown)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:18:14 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAL9jLaZyPBDaGyom4Qrdt+TfzBONftH_Zxtjp1MfiH3tBLXejA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <m2399acpu2.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAK__Kzv92Wgf0hUHq=nKjnUpp=-nTdpq4_fxJdfQs2J4e+_5tw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 15 Mar 2012, at 21:03, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:35:13 PDT, George Herbert said:
>> What, senior network people testing out new test/transitional space at
>> home before they test it at work is bad?
> 
> Either that, or Randy was being snarky about how long the promise to *only* use
> the address space for numbering CGN interfaces and not as additional RFC1918
> space was going to last in reality....

So where is that new /10 leaking to already? ;).

Tim

References:
- shared address space... a reality!
  - From: christopher.morrow at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- shared address space... a reality!
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- shared address space... a reality!
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- shared address space... a reality!
  - From: jerome at ceriz.fr (Jérôme Nicolle)
- shared address space... a reality!
  - From: george.herbert at gmail.com (George Herbert)
- shared address space... a reality!
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)

Prev by Date: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by Date: Anyone have experience with Adconion Direct?
Previous by thread: shared address space... a reality!
Next by thread: shared address space... a reality!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread