[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: hvgeekwtrvl at gmail.com (james machado)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:38:05 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m2d38gf8p7.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m2aa3kf6qx.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

2012/3/14 Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>:
 < stuff deleted >
> For high speed (fixed time) routed look up with 1M entries, SRAM is
> cheap at /24 and is fine at /32 but expensive and power consuming
> TCAM is required at /48.
>
> That's one reason why we should stay away from IPv6.
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Masataka Ohta
>

I found this bit of research from 2007 (
http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~wlu/papers/tcam.pdf ).  It seems to me there
are probably more ways to mix and match different types of ram to be
able to deal with this beast.

james

Follow-Ups:
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: gih at apnic.net (Geoff Huston)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: gih at apnic.net (Geoff Huston)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)

Prev by Date: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by Date: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Previous by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread