[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:57:10PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> >> That's one reason why we should stay away from IPv6.
> >
> > What prevents you from using
> > http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v1/n6/full/ncomms1063.html
> > with IPv6?
>
> Though I didn't paid $32 to read the full paper, it's like
> a proposal of geography based addressing.
You can access the free full text at http://arxiv.org/pdf/1009.0267v2.pdf
> So, I should ask what prevents you from using it with IPv4?
Because IPv4 will be legacy by the time something like this lands,
and because IPv6 needs more bits/route so more pain there.
- References:
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: gih at apnic.net (Geoff Huston)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: gih at apnic.net (Geoff Huston)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: eugen at leitl.org (Eugen Leitl)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)