[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:39:21PM +0000, Leigh Porter wrote:
> > From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu]
> >
> > The only reason you got HDMI at all was because the content owners
> > managed to get HDCP included. You won't get a replacement that doesn't
> > do HDCP until we fix the sorry state of copyright in the US.
> > So it's equivalent to asking if we're going to fix copyright within
> > your lifetime... :)
> When the revolution comes, all will be fixed.
Mmmmmhmmmmm. Yeah. But until then, it's equivalent to solving the
halting problem.
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mikea at mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
- References:
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: malayter at gmail.com (Ryan Malayter)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: malayter at gmail.com (Ryan Malayter)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com (Leigh Porter)