[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:00:03 -0400
In-reply-to: <7140c7c3-827e-4215-a77c-91fb458f4947@h20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> (Ryan Malayter's message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:27:43 -0700 (PDT)")
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <7140c7c3-827e-4215-a77c-91fb458f4947@h20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

Ryan Malayter <malayter at gmail.com> writes:

> On Mar 12, 10:07?am, "Robert E. Seastrom" <r... at seastrom.com> wrote:
>> It didn't help that there was initially no implementation of shim6
>> whatsoever. ?That later turned into a single prototype implementation
>> of shim6 for linux. ?As much as I tried to keep an open mind about
>> shim6, eventually it became clear that this was a Gedankenexperiment
>> in protocol design. ?Somewhere along the line I started publicly
>> referring to it as "sham6". ?I'm sure I'm not the only person who came
>> to that conclusion.
>>
>
> I thought the IETF required two inter-operable implementations for
> protocols. Or was that just for standards-track stuff?

Rough consensus and working code is soooooo 1993.

-r

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: malayter at gmail.com (Ryan Malayter)

Prev by Date: US withdraws IANA RFP, ‘no suitable responses’
Next by Date: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Previous by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread