[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:10:05 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbW9vxxB1rgn6YthkvJ_rL3kF_y4frEdbOzbbrp-L+oi7g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

> Deaggregating to /48's is not a good idea, but giving an LIR a few bits
> (something like 3 or 4) to deaggregate makes sense.
> 
> - Sander
> 

+1

I wouldn't have a problem with a few bits of disaggregation. That seems reasonable for a network that might be subject to partitioning or doesn't have a fully meshed internal net.

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: berni at birkenwald.de (Bernhard Schmidt)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: sander at steffann.nl (Sander Steffann)

Prev by Date: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by Date: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Previous by thread: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread