[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- Subject: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: berni at birkenwald.de (Bernhard Schmidt)
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:08:03 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CAJAdsDmydXjTJw=K4SuQq9CAGtvOqupNwzdsziMn7EwnHZXu6w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJAdsDmydXjTJw=K4SuQq9CAGtvOqupNwzdsziMn7EwnHZXu6w@mail.gmail.com>
On 09.03.2012 17:04, PC wrote:
> I think ARIN issues /48s for Provider independent space as the
> minimum allocation size, so I'm guessing we shouldn't filter below
> that. At least, that's what's in their current policies.
Note that I explicitly wrote:
| I used to be (or still am) on the same page as you are. I was
| dropping everything smaller than a /36 from PA ranges at the edge.
^^^^^^^
Of course I'm accepting /48 from PI range (in ARIN world 2001:500::/30
2001:504::/30 and 2620::/23), anything else would be quite brain-dead
and stupid.
Bernhard