[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
- Subject: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
- From: source_route at yahoo.com (Philip Lavine)
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
- In-reply-to: <CAM7FjJe5w7M7xWuUhQLkbw44cq1_c0uU4HEbXbBD__z=MU5PHA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAM7FjJe5w7M7xWuUhQLkbw44cq1_c0uU4HEbXbBD__z=MU5PHA@mail.gmail.com>
Easy part:
I need to provide my users acces to the internet from my HQ site via a local Internet connection or via a?colo.?
?
Hard part:
I also need to provide incoming access to hosted apps (HTTP, FTP, SMTP) from either location, so if the colo internet connection goes down the traffic can re-route to the HQ server farm and visa versa.
I am in the process of purchasing an AS and ip space. Is it advisable to use the same IP space at both locations and run iBGP over a dedicated L2 connection between the sites.
?
P
?
________________________________
From: Mick O'Rourke <mkorourke at gmail.com>
To: Philip Lavine <source_route at yahoo.com>
Cc: "nanog at nanog.org" <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
As in
- use of multi or single AS?
- private, vpn or other dci?
- etc
What's the purpose of the site? Or what end result are you trying to achieve?
On Jun 15, 2012 6:04 AM, "Philip Lavine" <source_route at yahoo.com> wrote:
?Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming accross two phyiscally seperated sites.
>