[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
very confusing.
- Subject: very confusing.
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:34:05 +1000
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:12:38 +0100." <[email protected]>
- References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAPrnuxRixA9IqgVeRWMMHSvCgAAAEAAAAKp9gAUIW7ZPl5K2ZdYzcWUBAAAAAA==@iptechnologylabs.com> <m262auc3yl.wl%[email protected]> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAPrnuxRixA9IqgVeRWMMHSvCgAAAEAAAAL4o0vKY51ZAlEmPwWMGKX8BAAAAAA==@iptechnologylabs.com> <m2txyeamuy.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]>
In message <4FD91056.3030206 at foobar.org>, Nick Hilliard writes:
> >> Be advised that Im following your posts and have your threating
> >> messages to me. If there is an ddos or restraint of trade due to my
> >> ACCIDENTAL email I'll escalate to commerce and FBI.
>
> 1. spam a big pile of network operators
> 2. threaten legals on aforementioned prospective customers
> 3. profit!!11!!
>
> awesome.
>
> Nick
Complain to you Congress and House Representatives that CAN-SPAM
is too unbalanced. The current US law lets you get away with single
shots. It should be a offence to send to someone you don't have
consent from. Look at the Australian SPAM act for a more balanced
act.
As long as US law allows companies to harvest addresses and send
to them this sort of thing will continue to happen.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org