Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD

[brunner at nic-naa.net (Eric Brunner-Williams)]

On 6/4/12 3:28 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Well, I note that at least the .secure promoters haven't decided it's
> a good idea:

the _known_ .secure-and-all-confusingly-similar-labels promoters.

the reveal is weeks away, followed by the joys of contention set
formation.

there may be more than one .secure application, and who knows, perhaps
a .sec in the bag, or a .cure, or a .seeker, or .sequre, or ...

however, yeah, the requirement bites at contract / delegation time, so
about a year in the future.

-e