[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 day and tunnels

Subject: IPv6 day and tunnels
From: jmaimon at ttec.com (Joe Maimon)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:09:27 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGQOgh-_Jpi9YQWePVyB6bZGDyVwEjn93so4_FVJ4NSU7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAAAwwbX2=2qkYyY0yHZwZrGkS59EYAmGu5xhdRBtG41OxvQ6pA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbWqM0PZXVg+wTsuCJgoZjXU444_JZuHfPaMWNRHdJvCNw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>


Owen DeLong wrote:

>
> There should be no such thing as packet fragmentation in the current
> protocol. What is needed is for people to simply configure things
> correctly and allow PTB messages to pass as designed.
>
> Owen


You are absolutely correct. Are you talking about IPv4 or IPv6?


Joe

References:
- IPv6 day and tunnels
  - From: jmaimon at ttec.com (Joe Maimon)
- IPv6 day and tunnels
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Cameron Byrne)
- IPv6 day and tunnels
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- IPv6 day and tunnels
  - From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar)
- IPv6 day and tunnels
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- IPv6 day and tunnels
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: IPv6 day and tunnels
Next by Date: test-ipv6.com / omgipv6day.com down
Previous by thread: IPv6 day and tunnels
Next by thread: IPv6 day and tunnels
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread