10G switchrecommendaton

[nanog-post at rsuc.gweep.net (Joe Provo)]

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 08:02:28PM -0200, Alvaro Pereira wrote:
> And note that the Juniper EX2500 does not run JUNOS, it is just an OEM box
> from someone else...

Blade Networks, now IBM.

> 
> Alvaro
> 
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:23, Tim Vollebregt <tim at interworx.nl> wrote:
> 
> > 2,5MB shared approximately.
> >
> > Aggregating 10G with microbursts is definately a no-go on such box.
> >
> > -Tim
> >
> >
> > On 27-01-12 12:33, James Braunegg wrote:
> >
> >> How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ??
> >>
> >> Kindest Regards
> >>
> >> James Braunegg
> >> W:  1300 769 972  |  M:  0488 997 207 |  D:  (03) 9751 7616
> >> E:   james.braunegg at micron21.com  |  ABN:  12 109 977 666
> >>
> >>
> >> This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain
> >> privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
> >> recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it
> >> to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in
> >> error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then
> >> delete the message from your computer.
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:tim at interworx.nl]
> >> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM
> >> To: nanog at nanog.org
> >> Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
> >>
> >> I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really
> >> small buffers.
> >>
> >> EX3300 as TOR
> >> EX82** as 10G aggregator
> >>
> >> -Tim
> >>
> >> On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >>> Juniper EX4500.
> >>>
> >>> -RR
> >>>
> >>> On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2000 at gmail.com>   wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test
> >>>> around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >

-- 
         RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE / NewNOG