[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
- Subject: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
- From: mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:58:45 +0800
- In-reply-to: <CAPtVV8BTffQ8o1MVVCmv-QhHn7Mjs+y-g=J-tKOZYbd6sX92jQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAPtVV8BTffQ8o1MVVCmv-QhHn7Mjs+y-g=J-tKOZYbd6sX92jQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, January 20, 2012 04:34:56 AM Thomas Donnelly
wrote:
> The warm standby IOS is a nice
> feature for in service upgrades and crash avoidance.
Except that some times, it did lead to crash (for us
anyway), because it eats up half the router's memory, and if
you're running 3x full tables or more, you ran out of the
other half and BOOM! And that was IOS XR 2, which is
generally old now.
We now turn off software redundancy now on all ASR1000 boxes
that don't have a 2nd RP.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120123/96b714fe/attachment.bin>