[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Whois 172/12

Subject: Whois 172/12
From: network.ipdog at gmail.com (Network IP Dog)
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:16:42 -0800
In-reply-to: <CAArzuotSm24VgaKy2hXJdr5TyZ9SeTVJBbDbniAqY6gxqAZjDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CAM9zEH7nU0Z55xzc81a8Z7GfKT_asp2BPA_vG5Cesj7dn=xftg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAArzuotSm24VgaKy2hXJdr5TyZ9SeTVJBbDbniAqY6gxqAZjDQ@mail.gmail.com>

<quote>Jesus. 172.16/12 fine .. that's rfc1918.   The rest of 172/8 is mostly unallocated.</quote>

What's with the language?

Ephesians 4:32  &  Cheers!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [mailto:ops.lists at gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:35 AM
To: Patrick W. Gilmore
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Whois 172/12

Jesus. 172.16/12 fine .. that's rfc1918.   The rest of 172/8 is mostly
unallocated.

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
> Read RFC1918.
>
> Likely a machine on his local network (i.e. behind the same NAT box) is hitting him.
>
> But that is not guaranteed.  A packet with a source address of 172.0.x.x



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)

Follow-Ups:
- Whois 172/12
  - From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)

References:
- Whois 172/12
  - From: ted at fred.net (Ted Fischer)
- Whois 172/12
  - From: r.hyunseog at ieee.org (Alex Ryu)
- Whois 172/12
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Whois 172/12
  - From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)

Prev by Date: accessing multiple devices via a script
Next by Date: Monday Night Footbal -- on Google?
Previous by thread: Whois 172/12
Next by thread: Whois 172/12
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread