[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Linux Centralized Administration
- Subject: Linux Centralized Administration
- From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:58:10 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAAAwwbUire4e=kj+h1p-oHWnJFJeLh3dQyCorMZEFN+hEXkK7Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbUire4e=kj+h1p-oHWnJFJeLh3dQyCorMZEFN+hEXkK7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Sounds like a poorly designed package. Wordpress does a good job of allowing back end updates without impacting the services provided, even with database changes.
Part of a well designed and maintained system is the ability to do painless upgrades.
Jared Mauch
On Jan 12, 2012, at 7:43 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Cacti/OpenNMS are good examples -- after a yum update to a new version,
> you must manually invoke, a potentially dangerous "installer" program or
> web page has to be used, after a new update, config files, or database
> schema have to be edited or patched by hand; until you manually take some
> action to "fix" the config, the application is broken after update.
> As soon as you attempt to restart the application it will shutdown OK, but
> not come back up.