[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?
- Subject: subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?
- From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:24:28 +0100 (CET)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CALFTrnOHam-s-9699nFr_K6M5oOYMgoMJpQv+Ai-QFju2PC4qA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> "Note: An IPv4 route requires only one TCAM entry. Because of the
> hardware compression scheme used for IPv6, an IPv6 route can take
> more than one TCAM entry, reducing the number of entries forwarded
> in hardware. For example, for IPv6 directly connected IP addresses,
> the desktop template might allow less than two thousand entries."
>
>
> Translated: "The stated numbers for IPv6 routes are twice the real max.
> However, prefix compression may give better utilisation under certain
> conditions".
Thanks, that's the first *specific* information I've seen of equipment
that might have problems (reduced number of entries) with longer than
64 bit prefixes. Fortunately we're not using 3560/3750 for IPv6 routing
at the moment.
Any other takers?
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no